2004 Animal Suffering Hunting 
Animal Ethics
MAY 25, 2008
In other words, what they hated—and by no means perversely—was the enjoyment of animal suffering; to the mere fact that the bears suffered as a consequence of human action they were indifferent. That, on the whole, is the Christian tradition. Controversies no doubt remain.
Animal Ethics
OCTOBER 29, 2008
Whereas it once used to be argued, as by Newman , that the least human good compensates for any possible amount of animal suffering, the current doctrine is that it requires a considerable good to compensate for such suffering. The degree of restriction placed on human behavior, furthermore, is relatively slight.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content