Animal Ethics and Morals - Animal Rights Zone

A Question for Animal Ethics Readers

Animal Ethics

JANUARY 23, 2008

I'd love to know whether philosophical reflection and argumentation has had an impact on your moral attitudes toward animals or on the moral attitudes towards animals of someone you know. Let us hear from you.

Animal Ethics

Animal Ethics Ethics For Animals Animal

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 1 of 13

Animal Ethics

JANUARY 9, 2009

A third of a century ago, when the modern animal-liberation movement was in its infancy, Martin published an essay entitled “A Critique of Moral Vegetarianism,” Reason Papers (fall 1976): 13-43. You will, therefore, agree with Martin about moral vegetarianism but not about Christianity. Another reason is moral.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Meat Vegan

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 13 of 13

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 6, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. CONCLUSION There is no doubt that moral vegetarianism will continue to be a position that attracts people concerned with the plight of animals and with humanitarian goals. One final point.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Protest Protesting

Webinars

Test

Webinar & PDF Test 2

Gabriel's PDF Webinar 234

Andrew Test Webinar

MORE WEBINARS

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 2 of 13

Animal Ethics

JANUARY 21, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. SOME PROBLEMS OF MORAL VEGETARIANISM With respect to traditional moral vegetarianism some problems immediately come to the fore. Who exactly is not supposed to eat animals or products of animals?

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Meat Lions

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 12 of 13

Animal Ethics

NOVEMBER 9, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. People who do not eat meat for moral reasons tend to be less brutal than people who do eat meat. People who eat meat after reflection on the morality of eating meat are less brutal than people who eat meat without such reflection.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Inhumane Meat

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 5 of 13

Animal Ethics

MARCH 27, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. ARGUMENTS FOR MORAL VEGETARIANISM A variety of arguments have been given for vegetarianism. Sometimes they take such a sketchy form that it is not completely clear they are moral arguments. Tags: Moral Vegetarianism.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Monkeys Meat

Jonathan Bennett on Revisable Morality

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 31, 2008

There is a difficulty about drawing from all this a moral for ourselves. But then we can say this because we can say that all those are bad moralities, whereas we cannot look at our own moralities and declare them bad. It is natural to feel sympathy for animals who are suffering. This is bad faith.

Morals

Morals Factory Farming Factory Farm Neglecting

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 4 of 13

Animal Ethics

MARCH 8, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. What Is an Animal Part? The last example suggests the difficulty of making a clear distinction between an animal part and an animal product. They suggest that any simple moral vegetarianism is impossible. KBJ: Bingo.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Suffering Vegan

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 6 of 13

Animal Ethics

APRIL 16, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. One might assume—although again this assumption may not be jusitified [sic]—that Mr. One might assume—although again this assumption may not be jusitified [sic]—that Mr. Morse was using this consideration as a moral argument for vegetarianism.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Humane Society Of The United States Slaughtered

Health and Morals

Animal Ethics

APRIL 10, 2009

He seems to think that the demand for free-range pork is a demand for wild pork, when in fact it's a demand for morally acceptable conditions for the pigs. Here is a New York Times op-ed column about free-range pigs. The author is confused. In other words, people want to eat not wild pigs but domestic pigs raised in humane conditions.

Morals

Morals Free Range Pigs New York Times

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 9 of 13

Animal Ethics

JULY 7, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. The Argument from Animal Rights A stronger argument is made by people who maintain that animals have rights. In particular, it has been argued that animals have a right to life. According to Benn, only moral agents have rights.

Morals

Morals Vegetarian Suffering Killing

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 11 of 13

Animal Ethics

SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

For an explanation of this feature, click on “Moral Vegetarianism” at the bottom of this post. The Argument from Human Grain Shortage All of the clearly moral arguments for vegetarianism given so far have been in terms of animal rights and suffering. Tags: Moral Vegetarianism. KBJ: I’m speechless.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Meat Cattle

J. J. C. Smart on the Moral Elite

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 28, 2010

Let us think of the more moral members of society as a moral elite, much as the generality of scientists form a scientific elite. I hope I do not need to stress that such a moral elite must not be confused with a social or intellectual elite. I am myself not so heroic. I eat eggs though they may come from battery hens.

Morals

Morals Whaling Whales Chickens

Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900) on Received Morality

Animal Ethics

NOVEMBER 17, 2008

Again, all or most men in whom the moral consciousness is strongly developed find themselves from time to time in conflict with the commonly received morality of the society to which they belong: and thus—as was before said—have a crucial experience proving that duty does not mean to them what other men will disapprove of them for not doing.

Morals

Morals Indianapolis Ethics Experience

Bernard E. Rollin on the Moral Status of Animals

Animal Ethics

NOVEMBER 25, 2016

Philosophers have shown that the standard reasons offered to exclude animals from the moral circle, and to justify not assessing our treatment of them by the same moral categories and machinery we use for assessing the treatment of humans, do not meet the test of moral relevance. 41 in A Companion to Bioethics , 2d ed.,

Morals

Morals Animal 2009 Humane

John Passmore (1914-2004) on the Moral Status of Animals

Animal Ethics

MAY 25, 2008

One restriction on the absolutism of man's rule over Nature is now generally accepted: moral philosophers and public opinion agree that it is morally impermissible to be cruel to animals. Controversies no doubt remain.

Morals

Morals 2004 Animal Suffering Vivisection

Henry S. Salt (1851-1939) on Beefy Morals

Animal Ethics

APRIL 10, 2009

A nice moral bond of union, truly, between colonies and motherland! "We interknit ourselves with every part of the English-speaking world," said the journal of the Cosme colony , in Paraguay, describing its Christmas celebration of 1898, "by the most sacred ceremony of over-eating." Good living," unfortunately, is a somewhat equivocal term.

Morals

Morals Paraguay Vegetarian Meat

J. J. C. Smart on the Moral Status of Animals

Animal Ethics

AUGUST 19, 2009

In the past I have been concerned to advocate a normative utilitarian theory from the point of view of a non-cognitivist meta-ethics. I assumed that Hume was right in thinking that ultimately morality depends on how we feel about things. I described the feelings to which I wished to appeal as "generalized benevolence."

Morals

Morals Animal Liberation Animal Dolphins

Bernard E. Rollin on Animals as Ends

Animal Ethics

SEPTEMBER 9, 2012

Surely any sentient or conscious being has states that matter to it in a positive or negative way—pleasure matters to an animal in a positive way, pain or fear in a negative way. Given the logic of morality, we should extend our moral attention to those states that matter to it when our actions affect that being.

Animal

Animal Morals Animal Ethics 2005

Earth Day Lecture

Animal Ethics

APRIL 18, 2007

Since a number of "Animal Ethics" readers reside in the northern Illinois area, I thought I would call your attention to an exciting lecture that is taking place on Northern Illinois University's campus. She specializes in Environmental Ethics, Human-Animal Ethics, and Moral Psychology. Jenni, Ph.D.

Illinois

Illinois Animal Ethics Ethics Animal Welfare

Jan Narveson on Moral Vegetarianism

Animal Ethics

JUNE 17, 2008

It would remain true, of course, that the vegetarian diet is more limited, since every pleasure available to the vegetarian is also available to the carnivore (not counting the moral satisfactions involved, of course—which would be question-begging), plus more which are not available to the vegetarian so long as he remains one.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals Vegetarian Cooking Slaughtered

W. D. Ross (1877-1971) on the Moral Significance of Pleasure and Pain

Animal Ethics

AUGUST 30, 2011

But when a moral being is feeling a pleasure or pain that is deserved or undeserved, or a pleasure or pain that implies a good or a bad disposition, the total fact is quite inadequately described if we say 'a sentient being is feeling pleasure, or pain'.

Morals

Morals Indianapolis Humane Suffering

From the Mailbag

Animal Ethics

MARCH 13, 2008

First of all, I want to tell you how much I enjoy Animal Ethics. I especially liked your posting from Gardner Williams’ “The Moral Insignificance of the Total of All Value.” I would love if you could mention AnimalWork.org on Animal Ethics to let your readers know about it. I read it all the time.

Animal Ethics

Animal Ethics Maryland Ethics Animal Friendly

From the Mailbag

Animal Ethics

APRIL 9, 2008

Dear Professor Burgess-Jackson, The Michigan Law Review ’s companion journal First Impressions this week published an online symposium on Agricultural Animals and Animal Law. The symposium includes contributions that discuss the moral status of nonhuman animals.

Michigan

Michigan Animal Ethics Laws Morals

Moral Vegetarianism

Animal Ethics

JANUARY 12, 2007

If you'd like to read Andrew Tardiff's 1996 essay "Simplifying the Case for Vegetarianism," write to me (by clicking "Contact" in the sidebar) and I'll send a copy. The essay is fabulous.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Morals

Peter Singer on Animal Rights

Animal Ethics

FEBRUARY 10, 2008

My basic moral position (as my emphasis on pleasure and pain and my quoting Bentham might have led Fox to suspect) is utilitarian. I make very little use of the word 'rights' in Animal Liberation , and I could easily have dispensed with it altogether. I have little to say about rights because rights are not important to my argument.

Animal Rights

Animal Rights Rights Animal Liberation Animal

From the Mailbag

Animal Ethics

AUGUST 30, 2007

It was the first lecture series of its kind in german speaking world organized by the members of the Interdisziplinäre Arbeitsgemeinschaft Tierethik (literally “Interdisciplinary Study Group on Animal Ethics”) – an initiative of students. The results of the lectures are written down in this book.

Germany

Germany Animal Ethics Switzerland Netherlands

From the Mailbag

Animal Ethics

JANUARY 15, 2007

Once I put two and two together and realized where my food came from and the moral inconsistency of it all there was no turning back. I must advocate on behalf of the animals in other ways. Animal Ethics helps me formalize my position so I can be a more effective advocate. Thanks again and keep up the good work.

Factory Farm

Factory Farm Factory Farming Vegan Animal Ethics

Introducing Myself

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 18, 2006

Currently, I am very interested in social and political philosophy and ethical issues. I felt a strong sense of connection to the ideas of Peter Singer while taking Ethics from Keith. Currently, I do not believe that killing an animal is prima facie morally wrong.

Factory Farm

Factory Farm Factory Farming Morals Factory

Tom Regan (1938-2017), R.I.P.

Animal Ethics

FEBRUARY 18, 2017

Each of us can help bring an end to these terrible things by not eating animals, not wearing animals, not purchasing products tested on animals, and not consuming animal products.

Raleigh

Raleigh Animal Advocacy 2017 Animal Rights

Meat, Cancer, and the Cumulative Case for Ethical Vegetarianism

Animal Ethics

JANUARY 20, 2008

Ethical vegetarianism is the thesis that killing and eating animals is morally wrong whenever equally nutritious plant-based alternatives are available. The case for ethical vegetarianism starts with several uncontroversial premises. It is not just a few outspoken animal rights fanatics who hold this view.

Vegetarian

Vegetarian Lacto-Ovo Meat Ethics

Henry S. Salt (1851-1939) on Moral Blindness

Animal Ethics

OCTOBER 31, 2009

I do not share the extreme vegetarian view that food reform is the foundation of other reforms, for I think it can be shown that all cruelties to animals, whether inflicted in the interests of the dinner-table, the laboratory, the hunting-field, or any other institution, are the outcome of one and the same error—the blindness which can see no unity (..)

Morals

Morals Vegetarian Non Human Cruelty

H. J. McCloskey on Animal Rights

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 1, 2010

As regards animals, the position is clear. If an animal has the relevant moral capacities, actually or potentially, then it can be a possessor of rights. It may for this reason be morally appropriate for us meanwhile to act towards the former animals as if they are possessors of rights. (H.

Animal Rights

Animal Rights Rights Animal Morals

W. D. Ross (1877-1971) on the Right and the Good

Animal Ethics

SEPTEMBER 19, 2011

Now when we ask what is the general nature of morally good actions, it seems quite clear that it is in virtue of the motives that they proceed from that actions are morally good. Thus a morally good action need not be the doing of a right act, and the doing of a right act need not be a morally good action.

Rights

Rights Indianapolis Morals Meat

Animals

Animal Ethics

AUGUST 23, 2007

Is there a morally relevant difference between hunting and dogfighting, such that only the latter is wrong? If there is no morally relevant difference between these activities, then either both are right or both are wrong. Hunting is morally acceptable. Hunting is morally acceptable. Dogfighting is morally unacceptable.

Morals

Morals Animal Hunting Rights

Referring to Animals

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 24, 2006

The question (presumably) is whether animals have moral status, i.e., whether the interests of animals must be taken into account in our deliberations. Using “who” assumes that the being in question has moral status (even if not full-blown personhood). Does your dog have the same moral status as your car?

Animal

Animal Morals Dogs Cats

Tom Regan on Kant's View of Animals

Animal Ethics

JUNE 27, 2012

That Kant should hold such a view should not be surprising; it is a direct consequence of his moral theory, the main outlines of which may be briefly, albeit crudely, summarized. As such, no moral agent is ever to be treated merely as a means. Moral agents are not nonrational, do not have "only a relative value," and are not things.

Los Angeles

Los Angeles Morals Animal 2004

Alexander Broadie and Elizabeth M. Pybus on Kant's Treatment of Animals

Animal Ethics

OCTOBER 21, 2008

But since something can correctly be regarded as an object of moral action if, and only if, it is worthy of respect, it follows that persons, and persons only, can be objects of moral action. From this it follows that any being that is not a person can, with moral justification, be used merely as a means.

Morals

Morals Animal Ethics Rights

Leonard Nelson (1882-1927) on Duties and Rights

Animal Ethics

APRIL 23, 2008

Under the moral law, all beings who have interests are subjects of rights, while all those who in addition to having interests, are capable of grasping the demands of duty, are subjects of duties. The defining characteristic of moral agency is autonomy ("rational self-determination"). Nonhuman animals (even apes) are in category 3.

Rights

Rights Morals Apes Laws

Plant Rights

Animal Ethics

MAY 4, 2008

If Smith thinks that plant rights and animal rights stand or fall together, then he is confused, for there is a morally relevant difference between plants and animals, namely, that only the latter are sentient. Addendum: Smith appears not to understand the animal-rights movement. Animals have weight on the moral scale.

Rights

Rights Animal Rights Movement Morals Ethical Treatment

Parity

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 12, 2008

It's morally permissible to eat cows. It's not morally permissible to eat dogs. There are no morally relevant differences between cows and dogs. He is asking them to state the morally relevant difference that justifies the rejection of 3. The following three propositions are inconsistent: 1.

Indiana

Indiana Cows Morals Dogs

Organic Food

Animal Ethics

DECEMBER 4, 2006

Note that this debate is independent of the debate about the moral permissibility of eating fish. If organically raised fish suffer less than nonorganically raised fish, it is an accident, morally speaking. It's possible, in other words, that some organic methods inflict greater pain on the animals than nonorganic methods.

Morals

Morals New York Times Raised Fish

W. V. Quine (1908-2000) on Altruism

Animal Ethics

FEBRUARY 5, 2010

The predicament in such a non-moral case will concern only the individual and a few associates. When the ultimate values concerned are moral ones, on the other hand, and more particularly altruistic ones, the case is different; for the individual in such a dilemma has all society on his conscience. It need not.

2000

2000 Morals Vivisection Science

Tom Regan on Utilitarianism

Animal Ethics

JULY 24, 2012

The initial attractiveness of utilitarianism as a moral theory on which to rest the call for the better treatment of animals was noted in an earlier context. Because animals are sentient (i.e., Because animals are sentient (i.e.,

Los Angeles

Los Angeles Animal Rights Movement Factory Farm Factory Farming

A Question for Animal Ethics Readers

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 1 of 13

Webinars

Trending Sources

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 13 of 13

Webinars

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 2 of 13

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 12 of 13

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 5 of 13

Jonathan Bennett on Revisable Morality

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 4 of 13

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 6 of 13

Health and Morals

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 9 of 13

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 11 of 13

J. J. C. Smart on the Moral Elite

Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900) on Received Morality

Bernard E. Rollin on the Moral Status of Animals

John Passmore (1914-2004) on the Moral Status of Animals

Henry S. Salt (1851-1939) on Beefy Morals

J. J. C. Smart on the Moral Status of Animals

Bernard E. Rollin on Animals as Ends

Earth Day Lecture

Jan Narveson on Moral Vegetarianism

W. D. Ross (1877-1971) on the Moral Significance of Pleasure and Pain

From the Mailbag

From the Mailbag

Moral Vegetarianism

Peter Singer on Animal Rights

From the Mailbag

From the Mailbag

Introducing Myself

Tom Regan (1938-2017), R.I.P.

Meat, Cancer, and the Cumulative Case for Ethical Vegetarianism

Henry S. Salt (1851-1939) on Moral Blindness

H. J. McCloskey on Animal Rights

W. D. Ross (1877-1971) on the Right and the Good

Animals

Referring to Animals

Tom Regan on Kant's View of Animals

Alexander Broadie and Elizabeth M. Pybus on Kant's Treatment of Animals

Leonard Nelson (1882-1927) on Duties and Rights

Plant Rights

Parity

Organic Food

W. V. Quine (1908-2000) on Altruism

Tom Regan on Utilitarianism

Stay Connected