Remove Animal Remove Humane Remove Indianapolis
article thumbnail

Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900) on Animals

Animal Ethics

or are we to confine our view to human happiness? Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1981], bk. We have next to consider who the "all'' are, whose happiness is to be taken into account. Are we to extend our concern to all the beings capable of pleasure and pain whose feelings are affected by our conduct? published in 1874])

article thumbnail

W. D. Ross (1877-1971) on Animal Rights

Animal Ethics

This arises from the fact that we have duties to animals and to infants. We had better therefore take the less complicated case of animals, which we commonly suppose not to be even potential moral agents. It may of course be denied that we have duties to animals. Professor D.

article thumbnail

W. D. Ross (1877-1971) on the Moral Significance of Pleasure and Pain

Animal Ethics

Ross, The Right and the Good [Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1988], 137 [first published in 1930]) Note from KBJ: Since the concepts of desert and good or bad disposition do not apply to animals (who are not moral agents), their pleasure is intrinsically good and their pain intrinsically bad.

Morals 40