Remove Dogs Remove New York Times Remove Slaughter Remove Suffering
article thumbnail

From Today's New York Times

Animal Ethics

If we are not justified in eating mackerel ourselves, are we not also morally obligated to stop the slaughter brought on by the tuna? David Peters New York, Nov. He’s right: I don’t care deeply about the suffering of animals I eat, wear or otherwise benefit from. Lisa Dinhofer Frederick, Md.,

article thumbnail

Moral Vegetarianism, Part 11 of 13

Animal Ethics

The Argument from Human Grain Shortage All of the clearly moral arguments for vegetarianism given so far have been in terms of animal rights and suffering. New moral vegetarianism, however, rests on moral arguments couched in terms of human welfare. Nobody wants existing animals to be slaughtered.

article thumbnail

Forget About Equal, How About Alive

Animal Person

You may have seen "Dog," posted by Stephanie. When I saw " From Science, Plenty of Cows but Little Profit " this morning in the New York Times , I immediately thought of "Dog." Emilio Flores for the New York Times.) We here in America claim we love dogs. If not, here it is.

Cows 100