Remove Morals Remove Resources Remove Suffering
article thumbnail

Are We Really a Movement?

Critter News

Humans get all wrapped up in stories of those who can communicate their sufferings. But how much can we accomplish when our resources are so divided? It's not sorry, it just hasn't found its moral, UNITED, ORGANIZED voice. One of the benefits that human rights movements have is that they are articulating for themselves.

article thumbnail

7 Tips to Skyrocket Performance In Small Sales Teams

Sales and Marketing Management

Small sales teams can perform incredibly well if you get the right balance of skills, motivation, and resources. Thankfully, there are so many resources out there that you are guaranteed to find a provider who can help you. . Couple it with more dynamic goals to boost morale and improve sales team performance.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Crates

Animal Ethics

It might be argued that any decrease in suffering for farmed animals is good, morally speaking. Indeed, doesn't it entrench the idea that they are resources for human use? Imagine arguing not that human chattel slavery ought to be abolished, but that it ought to be reformed so as to inflict less suffering on the slaves.

article thumbnail

Factory Farms

Animal Ethics

Notice that the author is not opposed to the use of nonhuman animals as resources for human consumption. She simply wants to minimize their suffering before they are killed (painlessly?) Here is a New York Times op-ed column about pork production. and their bodies dismembered and processed. I can't imagine what it is.

article thumbnail

Canine Inequality

Animal Ethics

Inequality per se is morally irrelevant. One difference between human beings and dogs is that human beings can see how others live, can measure the gap between their own resources and those of others, and can envy those who have more. How many are suffering for lack of food, fuel, shelter, clothing, or medical care?

Welfare 40
article thumbnail

From Today's New York Times

Animal Ethics

20, 2012 To the Editor: Blake Hurst asserts that “production methods should not cause needless suffering,” but the position he takes does just that. In addition, producing more meat worsens worldwide hunger and food insecurity by dedicating precious farmland and water resources to the production of animal feed. SUZANNE McMILLAN Dir.,

article thumbnail

The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and Who Pays for It

10,000 Birds

A new willingness among scientists to consider certain moral and ethical implications with respect to wild animals, where previously utilitarian ideas prevailed, including ideas of intrinsic value. As a consequence, “people should treat all creatures decently, and protect them from cruelty, avoidable suffering, and unnecessary killing.”

Wildlife 255